Partial progressAnalytic number theory3 min read

A failed Riemann attempt finds a stronger bound

Progress on how many zeros lie on the line, not a proof that all do.

Anthropic · Levent Alpöge · Alex Furman · earlier analytic number theorists

Where this stands

A substantial partial result. “67.2%” is not an approximate proof of a statement about every zero.

Start with the question

The problem

The Riemann hypothesis says that every nontrivial zero of the zeta function has real part 12\tfrac12. A related, weaker question asks what fraction of the zeros can be proved to lie on that critical line.

ζ(s)=∑n=1∞1ns=∏p prime11−p−s(Re⁡s>1)\begin{aligned} \zeta(s) &= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^{s}} \\ &= \prod_{p \text{ prime}} \frac{1}{1 - p^{-s}} \qquad (\operatorname{Re} s > 1) \end{aligned}

Before the news

Understand the mathematics

The established mathematics behind the story, step by step. What is new, and who claims it, follows below with sources.

A function that knows the primes

Euler noticed that the sum over all nn equals a product over the primes: expanding each factor 1/(1−p−s)=1+p−s+p−2s+⋯1/(1 - p^{-s}) = 1 + p^{-s} + p^{-2s} + \cdots and multiplying out produces every n−sn^{-s} exactly once, by unique factorization. Riemann (1859) extended ζ\zeta to all complex s≠1s \neq 1 and showed that its zeros control how regularly the primes are spaced. Von Koch proved in 1901 that the hypothesis is equivalent to the sharpest natural form of the prime number theorem:

π(x)=Li⁡(x)+O(x log⁡x),\pi(x) = \operatorname{Li}(x) + O\big(\sqrt{x}\, \log x\big),

where π(x)\pi(x) counts the primes up to xx and Li⁡(x)=∫2xdt/log⁡t\operatorname{Li}(x) = \int_2^x dt / \log t.

Where the zeros are

ζ\zeta has trivial zeros at −2,−4,−6,…-2, -4, -6, \dots. All the others lie in the critical strip 0<Re⁡s<10 < \operatorname{Re} s < 1, placed symmetrically around the critical line Re⁡s=12\operatorname{Re} s = \tfrac12 because of the functional equation

ξ(s)=ξ(1−s),ξ(s)=12 s(s−1) π−s/2 Γ ⁣(s2)ζ(s).\begin{gathered} \xi(s) = \xi(1 - s), \\ \xi(s) = \tfrac12\, s (s - 1)\, \pi^{-s/2}\, \Gamma\!\left(\tfrac{s}{2}\right) \zeta(s). \end{gathered}

Their number is known precisely: the zeros with 0<Im⁡s≤T0 < \operatorname{Im} s \le T number

N(T)=T2πlog⁡T2π−T2π+O(log⁡T).N(T) = \frac{T}{2\pi} \log \frac{T}{2\pi} - \frac{T}{2\pi} + O(\log T).
Counting zeros exactly on the line

On the critical line, ζ(12+it)\zeta(\tfrac12 + it) can be turned into a real function, Hardy's Z(t)=eiθ(t)ζ(12+it)Z(t) = e^{i\theta(t)} \zeta(\tfrac12 + it), so every sign change of ZZ is a zero exactly on the line. Hardy (1914) used this to find infinitely many. Write N0(T)N_0(T) for the zeros on the line; the question is how large a proportion κ\kappa one can prove:

N0(T)≥κ N(T)for all large T.N_0(T) \ge \kappa\, N(T) \quad \text{for all large } T.

Selberg (1942) proved that some κ>0\kappa > 0 works. Levinson (1974) reached κ>13\kappa > \tfrac13 and Conrey (1989) κ>25\kappa > \tfrac25; later refinements moved the record to about 41%. These methods multiply ζ\zeta by a mollifier, a short sum M(s)=∑n≤ybnn−sM(s) = \sum_{n \le y} b_n n^{-s} chosen to cancel its large values; longer mollifiers give better proportions but are much harder to control.

What 67.2% does and does not say

A bound of the form κ≥0.672\kappa \ge 0.672 proves that at least 67.2% of the zeros, counted up to height TT, lie on the line (and, as the paper's title says, are simple). The rest are not shown to be off the line; they are simply not proved to be on it. The Riemann hypothesis is the statement N0(T)=N(T)N_0(T) = N(T) for every TT, and no proportion short of all of them, even one approaching 100%, rules out infinitely many exceptions.

01

The unreasonable challenge

Anthropic says a staff member challenged an unreleased Claude model to attack the Riemann hypothesis. The attempt did not solve it. Instead, the model combined earlier analytic-number-theory work to improve a lower bound on zeros on the critical line, from 41.6% to 67.2%. [1]

02

What the paper actually promises

The Alpöge–Furman paper concerns more than two thirds of zeros being simple and on the critical line. That is a quantitative theorem about a proportion. It still leaves room for zeros off the line and therefore does not settle the universal claim made by the Riemann hypothesis. [2]

03

A formal statement to compare

The public formal-math repository identifies zeta23 as the corresponding Lean project. It describes pinned toolchains, comparator challenges, and independent-kernel checks. A reader can follow those verification instructions rather than relying on the percentage in a social-media headline. [3]

Inspect the evidence

The Lean formalization

Public zeta23 Lean development

The original zeta-23-lean link now redirects to anthropics/formal-math. Its project table links zeta23 to the Alpöge–Furman paper. Build and verification instructions are maintained there; no local proof rebuild was performed for this article.

Sources & further reading

Reviewed 9 Sept 2026. X permalinks were recovered from indexed posts and linked discussions; direct X pages were not consistently accessible. They document the conversation, not proof correctness.

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.

Work through it together

Discussion

Loading discussions…