A failed Riemann attempt finds a stronger bound
Progress on how many zeros lie on the line, not a proof that all do.
Anthropic · Levent Alpöge · Alex Furman · earlier analytic number theorists
Where this stands
A substantial partial result. “67.2%” is not an approximate proof of a statement about every zero.
Start with the question
The problem
The Riemann hypothesis says that every nontrivial zero of the zeta function has real part . A related, weaker question asks what fraction of the zeros can be proved to lie on that critical line.
Before the news
Understand the mathematics
The established mathematics behind the story, step by step. What is new, and who claims it, follows below with sources.
A function that knows the primes
Euler noticed that the sum over all equals a product over the primes: expanding each factor and multiplying out produces every exactly once, by unique factorization. Riemann (1859) extended to all complex and showed that its zeros control how regularly the primes are spaced. Von Koch proved in 1901 that the hypothesis is equivalent to the sharpest natural form of the prime number theorem:
where counts the primes up to and .
Where the zeros are
has trivial zeros at . All the others lie in the critical strip , placed symmetrically around the critical line because of the functional equation
Their number is known precisely: the zeros with number
Counting zeros exactly on the line
On the critical line, can be turned into a real function, Hardy's , so every sign change of is a zero exactly on the line. Hardy (1914) used this to find infinitely many. Write for the zeros on the line; the question is how large a proportion one can prove:
Selberg (1942) proved that some works. Levinson (1974) reached and Conrey (1989) ; later refinements moved the record to about 41%. These methods multiply by a mollifier, a short sum chosen to cancel its large values; longer mollifiers give better proportions but are much harder to control.
What 67.2% does and does not say
A bound of the form proves that at least 67.2% of the zeros, counted up to height , lie on the line (and, as the paper's title says, are simple). The rest are not shown to be off the line; they are simply not proved to be on it. The Riemann hypothesis is the statement for every , and no proportion short of all of them, even one approaching 100%, rules out infinitely many exceptions.
01
The unreasonable challenge
Anthropic says a staff member challenged an unreleased Claude model to attack the Riemann hypothesis. The attempt did not solve it. Instead, the model combined earlier analytic-number-theory work to improve a lower bound on zeros on the critical line, from 41.6% to 67.2%. [1]
02
What the paper actually promises
The Alpöge–Furman paper concerns more than two thirds of zeros being simple and on the critical line. That is a quantitative theorem about a proportion. It still leaves room for zeros off the line and therefore does not settle the universal claim made by the Riemann hypothesis. [2]
03
A formal statement to compare
The public formal-math repository identifies zeta23 as the corresponding Lean project. It describes pinned toolchains, comparator challenges, and independent-kernel checks. A reader can follow those verification instructions rather than relying on the percentage in a social-media headline. [3]
Inspect the evidence
The Lean formalization
Public zeta23 Lean development
The original zeta-23-lean link now redirects to anthropics/formal-math. Its project table links zeta23 to the Alpöge–Furman paper. Build and verification instructions are maintained there; no local proof rebuild was performed for this article.
Sources & further reading
Reviewed 9 Sept 2026. X permalinks were recovered from indexed posts and linked discussions; direct X pages were not consistently accessible. They document the conversation, not proof correctness.
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Work through it together
Discussion
Loading discussions…